“Everybody’s doing something; we’ll do nothing!”

By Anthony Castrovince/MLB.com
On Twitter: @Castrovince

The MLB Trade Deadline has passed, and what did the Indians do?

They did nothing.

Well, sure, they acquired Brent Lillibridge last week and they got Lars Anderson from the Red Sox just before the deadline, but, you know, like I said:

They did nothing.

For the better part of the past two months, those of us who like to discuss such things talked about the Indians’ needs: Should they pursue a right-handed bat or starting arm? Starting arm or right-handed bat? Bat, arm. Arm, bat. Both? Tribe fans studied Jason Vargas’ game logs. They tried to talk themselves into Alfonso Soriano. And just when there seemed to be some consensus that, yes, an arm was what the Indians needed most, well, that’s when a new opinion intervened…

The Indians should sell! Yes, that’s right. They went 6-11 after the All-Star break and fell five games back of first place. Time to blow it up and start all over! Time to send your best player, Shin-Soo Choo, to Pittsburgh or Los Angeles or maybe even back to South Korea, as long as the return is Major League-ready. Send Justin Masterson — two years and two months away from free agency, mind you — back to Boston. Send Chris Perez to San Francisco and let him complain about their fans. Ship off anything that’s not nailed down… and yes I’m looking at you, Jose Lopez.

These were, to put it bluntly, especially schizophrenic circumstances, and perhaps they were unavoidable when you’re talking about a mediocre (minus-66 run differential, second-worst ERA in the league) contender (“Verlander Schmerlander”).

Rather than sway toward any side of the line, Chris Antonetti stayed Switzerland, content to let 2012 play out as-is.

It was not a surprising stance.

As discussed last week, this club’s needs were too many to address at the Deadline (and for this, the front office definitely deserves some blame, as Josh Willingham and/or Yoenis Cespedes would have been excellent and affordable additions last winter), and the trading chips on hand were too scarce. The 2012 Indians simply did not give Antonetti enough reason to pull the trigger on any trade that would have weakened an already frail farm system in exchange for a short-term rental. And that frail farm system (which, mind you, is also the fault of the front office) caught up to the Indians once again, as they don’t seem to have the adequate pieces to bring in an impact acquisition under control beyond 2012.

That addresses the “buy” situation, but what about the “sell”?

Well, when Antonetti made the Ubaldo Jimenez trade on July 30, 2011, he embraced a so-called “window of contention” based on the contractual control the Indians held on Jimenez, Choo, Masterson, Perez and Asdrubal Cabrera, each of whom would have been eligible for free agency either after 2013 (Choo, Jimenez, Cabrera*) or 2014 (Masterson, Perez).

*Cabrera, of course, has since been extended through 2014, and the contractual status remains the same for the rest.

Now, it’s my opinion that the Indians whiffed on Ubaldo. I don’t know how to put it any other way. We have no way of knowing what Drew Pomeranz (especially) and Alex White would have become in Cleveland instead of the pitcher’s nightmare that is Colorado, but the Indians at least would have had six years to find out. Instead, they got two years and two months of Jimenez, and the first calendar year has been an unqualified disappointment. Jimenez is 12-14 with a 5.08 ERA and 1.55 WHIP in 32 outings with the Indians. As my friend and colleague Jordan Bastian notes in this piece, Ubaldo currently leads the league in walks and stolen bases allowed and wild pitches thrown. He’s a mess.

But if you’re Antonetti, in the immediate, you have to make the most of that mess. You have to hope, perhaps against hope, that Jimenez, even if he’ll never become the ace-type arm he once was, at least rights himself enough to become a dependable middle-of-the-rotation guy. You have to hope the backward steps taken by Masterson and Carlos Santana this season are not indicative of future results and that the coaching staff you helped put in place is capable of righting them.

That’s the immediate, because the Trade Deadline, by nature, doesn’t seem to be the best time to make bold decisions about the future of the franchise (the Ubaldo and Cliff Lee deals, neither of which have gone particularly well, best illustrate the basis of that belief).

But the Indians are going to have an awfully interesting offseason ahead, because now that they have a feel for the outside interest levels in the likes of Choo and Masterson and Perez, maybe they’ll delve further down those roads.

I’ve expressed my opinion that the Indians ought to seriously consider parting with Perez for a variety of factors, not the least of which is money. The arbitration costs you’d save by dealing from a position of strength could be applied elsewhere, and Lord knows the Indians have plenty of places to apply them.

This 2012 season ought to serve as a lesson that, no, the almost completely left-handed lineup and the right-handed rotation do not lend themselves to the kind of sustained winning stretches it takes to be a true contender. Both of those issues absolutely need to be addressed, one way or another, if the Indians are going to contend in 2013, and perhaps Travis Hafner and Grady Sizemore coming off the books will help Antonetti do so. You can look at the Indians’ lineup, factoring in a healthy Lonnie Chisenhall and matured Jason Kipnis, and see the seeds of a competitive club. But as I wrote earlier, if the Indians do ultimately decide to deal Choo, they’d almost assuredly be taking a big step back with regard to their 2013 outlook, and that’s a tough sell to a fractured fan base.

Still, given the way the Jimenez trade has transpired and some notable core elements have disappointed this season, perhaps a step back in 2013 in order to augment the 2014, ’15, ’16 outlook is the way to proceed. I suppose that all depends on just how aggressive Antonetti plans to be (or, rather, has the budget capability to be) this winter in the construction of the 2013 club.

For now, Antonetti wasn’t aggressive at all at the 2012 Trade Deadline. I’m sure he racked up the cell phone minutes, but, ultimately, he did nothing.

And given the schizophrenic nature of a club that is not quite good enough to contend but not quite bad enough to detonate, maybe “nothing” makes sense.

~AC

9 Comments

The depleted farm system leaves only one option; trade the stregths for more depth. If they trade Choo for ML ready talent it’s a short term option and little benefit since it also leaves a gap. The short term option leads to a full blown rebuild during the 2014 or ’15 season. Putting together a Championship caliber team takes timing on the part of payroll and player readiness. The smaller trades Cleveland made for depth helped more in the long run than the big trades of Sabathia, Lee, and Martinez (see ACab, Perez, and Choo). The big trades have produced little which hurts the long term growth of the club and with the small market blues leads to full rebuild or allow players to walk away and Cleveland suffers from many years of sub .500 baseball until the draft can refill the club (see #1 draft picks history in Cleveland to realize how well that might go).

It’s not even that we’ll never know how Pomeranz and/or White would do in Cleveland, it’s that we don’t know what else we might have gotten for them. That’s the bigger “what if?” in my mind.
And as sad as it might be, the best arm we have in the wings is actually from the Lee trade — Carlos Carrasco. He was starting to show flashes of front of the rotation stuff before he went out last year, and the last I heard is he’s on track to be back in September. If we’re looking at pitching in our system for next year, him making a return to form is, sadly, a bright spot.
The Tribe could go out and get a right handed bat at 1B, DH, or LF in the off-season, but they’re still going to need pitching.

1) Poor results in the draft
2) Poor return on Sabathia and Lee trades
3) Poor decision to trade for Ubaldo, because you mortgaged your best prospects and also depth (Putnam, McBride). You did all sorts of video work to evaluate him before the trade and the doctors looked him over many times. Great evaluation techniques I must say.
4) Poor strategy of going for it last year and then acting cheap this off-season. No impact minor leaguers except Lindnor, and you don’t give Willingham an extra 3rd year at $7-$7.5M? You don’t even give Ludwick $2.5 million? Then you try to make up by committing $3M to Kotchman and almost $2M to Damon? You justify Kotchman to the fans for his amazing defense.
5) Antonetti often says he believes in the front office’s player evaluation skills. However, time to wake up and realize Canzler, Cunningham, and Lillibridge may have popped up in the fancy software program you use(probably paid lot of money for), but reality proved they are not the answer.
5) Owner Dolan said the team will never be in play for the big time free agents but will spend in the $7M range when the time is right. Well Antonetti’s Ubaldo deal “opened the window” and nothing was done. Contracts coming off the books this off-season put the payroll at rock bottom and even with arbitration salaries, the payroll is bare. Do you seriously expect fans to believe anything you say now? How about denying the Forbes report one more time?
6) We could of gotten Yuk from the RedSox, but I’m sure got scared away because of his option next year or the buyout.
7) The Padres traded for Quentin and resigned him and Huston Street. Oakland spent decent money on Cespedes. These teams are supposedly low payroll teams and the Padres were literally broke. We can’t even do something like this?
8) If you can’t even sign Choo or any players for $7M-$10M range, act aggressive then tease us and make stupid decisions, then what kind of team are we all supporting here?
9) You say yes to Derek Lowe and $5M salary, but tonight may have been his last move. Also, you probably spend a good amount on all these creative promotions to bring fans to the stadium.
10) Accountability needs to be taken by Antonetti and Shapiro. Fans deserve to be angry and the inconsistency with decision making is simply awful.

::claps hands::

Pingback: While We’re Waiting… Indians’ Standing Pat, Jim Tressel’s New Career and Hardesty Running Hard | WaitingForNextYear

I like the name of the title..LOL.

Pingback: FEATURED BLOG POST: Tomahawks Cutting Through the Gossamer | Cleveland Indians Dugout Online | Cleveland Indians Blog

Anthony – I’ve asked the same question on Twitter of Hoynes, Camino, and Bastian but never get any response. WHY do the Indians not want to give Jared Goedert a chance…apparently no matter what? He was on fire back in 2010 as well and we overlooked him then too. We always seem to bring up the wrong people. Why Carrera/Rottino over Fedroff?

Piece of writing writing is also a fun, if you know after that you can write otherwise it is complex to write.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers

%d bloggers like this: